Dutch Doctors Can Now Drug Dementia Patients Before Killing Them to Prevent Resistance

Political News


(AVNphotolab/Getty Images)

A few years ago, Dutch doctor Marinou Arends attended to her dementia patient in a nursing home. Arends wasn’t there to treat her, but to kill her via lethal injection.

To make it easier, Arends drugged her patient’s coffee, a violation of euthanasia rules. But in the midst of the termination, the patient woke up, saw what was happening, and began to struggle. The doctor instructed the family to hold the resisting patient down while she finished her off.

That would seem to be murder and a criminal prosecution was mounted. But this is Euthanasia Land. The Dutch Supreme Court later lauded the doctor for her good intentions and dismissed all criminal complaints.

You Might Like

Now, the Dutch have reacted to the case to create specific rules governing the euthanasia of dementia patients. Of course they now allow drugging to prevent resistance! From the Guardian story:

Doctors euthanising a patient with severe dementia may slip a sedative into their food or drink if there are concerns they will become “disturbed, agitated or aggressive”, under a change to the codes of practice in the Netherlands.

Another factor of the Arends story is worth noting. The patient had asked for euthanasia when she became incompetent, but she wanted to decide when. She never did. So, the rules were changed to govern that circumstance too:

The new code says that in cases where a patient has advanced dementia, “it is not necessary for the doctor to agree with the patient the time or manner in which euthanasia will be given”.

Kohnstamm said: “Doctors now have less to worry about putting their necks in a noose with euthanasia. They need less fear of justice. Or for the review committee.”

No, we wouldn’t want that.

This is now the law of the land in the Netherlands: If a dementia patient requested euthanasia when competent, the doctor decides why and when — and can drug the patient to make sure there is way to say no.

This is par for the Dutch course. The response to an egregious abuse isn’t to rein in illegal practice and stop further wrongdoing but expand and legalize it and make it right.

Once a society accepts killing as an acceptable response to human suffering, there are no outer boundaries limiting where the killing will ultimately go. Those with eyes to see, let them see.

 


Read the Original Article Here

Articles You May Like

Don’t sit out the Georgia runoffs even if you’re mad about the election
Does Mask Effectiveness Justify Universal Mandates?
Politico: From Tabasco Flood of Trump, We Sip Almond Milk with Biden
Days before Christmas, Jupiter and Saturn will look like one bright star — some believe the alignment is the same described in the Bible
Black Friday sales hit new record totals

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *